sponsored by
Husker Extra live chat: Steven M. Sipple, 10.31.16
Talk Huskers with Steve Sipple during his weekly live chat, every Monday.
-
@CDS: That's right, Nebraska has allowed only six sacks this season, fewest in the Big Ten. And yes, Riley did mention Armstrong's athleticism as being a leading factor. As for the "YOLO Spin" ... that is genius on your part. OK, genius is a stretch. But you get high marks for originality. I'll end the chat on that note.
3rd & 7 37yd
3rd & 7 37yd
B
S
O
close
close

-





-
-
Sip, keep me sane here because I still haven't gotten over my depression attack yet. I actually walked off the golf course on the 12th hole yesterday because I was still too upset to play. As I see it, the two things Neb does worst, is run up the middle, and straight drop back passing. Why on the last drive of regulation and in OT, those were the 2 things they tried to do?
-
@Gary: Langsdorf said after the game that the draw play had worked previously. As for the passes, it looked like Jordan Westerkamp may have been interfered with on the third-down play. As for the final pass, Langsdorf thought Stanley Morgan actually broke open for a splint second. There was pressure on Armstrong from T.J. Watt, which affected the throw.
-
-
-
Sip, I've got a comment and then two questions and I'll start with the comment...
I loved the way they played and am really proud again to be a Husker fan. It's been a gloomy decade or so, so it's nice to see Nebraska in national conversations again. In regards to the game, it's so very easy to be a Sunday morning QB. I didn't think the final drive had poor play calling as NU started to pick up chunks up the middle, so I don't have issues with those two runs. A pass was needed on third down and what happened there was unfortunate but no calls tend to happen in tight games, so what happened happened. I don't think Stanley saw they safety or Intruly believe he would have adjusted more and would have come down with the ball. It was unfortunate, but it happened. Now, the easy part of being a Sunday morning QB...
Tommy is the most competitive offensive player we have, maybe on the entire team, and maybe on the entire field Saturday. Could you ask Riley or Langsdorff if they ever thought about just running Tommy on every play until they crossed the goal line? I can't fathom Tommy not getting several first downs and then a TD.
My last question is about the 30 for 30 with the 95' team. I haven't heard anything about that and would like an update if it will or won't be airing. -
-
-
@Robin: I think Nebraska's lack of consistency on offense can be traced to a lot of elements, but line injuries have played a major role. Bottom line, the key numbers on offense -- points and yards per game -- have dropped precipitously in the last four games.
-
Follow up to what Gary said about running up the middle. What is the reason we are so poor with running inside the tackles most times. Is it scheme, o-line just isn't experienced enough, o-line injuries? I don't doubt their effort, but that's a key factor in winning games in this league particularly, in my opinion.
-
@John: Wisconsin had the nation's 10th-ranked rushing defense, so Riley and everyone else knew it was going to be tough sledding, as he calls it. Offensive line coach Mike Cavanaugh said inconsistency was an issue against Purdue. His guys have to finish blocks, he said. There simply haven't been many running lanes since the Northwestern game, and that's primarily a line issue.
-
-
-
-
-
-
@Matt: There is no doubt Armstrong struggled in that game (12-for-31, with two picks). He needed to play well for his team to win, and didn't. But he did make a few clutch plays, and he was far from the only issue. As has been pointed out, he seldom has had much time to throw in recent games.
-
-
-
-
-
Sip....I was curious if you knew the schedule of the open scrimmage for the men's basketball team tomorrow at 5:30? I went to the last one and they had both the women and men scrimmage. As well as some skill competitions. I wanted to plan my arrival time accordingly around just watching Miles' team. Thanks.
-
-
After what I saw from this weekend I'm kind of curious why OSU opens up at 15.5? They haven't been that impressive at all the last 2 weeks (losing to PSU and struggling at home to NW) I would almost say this game is more winnable for us than the Wisconsin game. Thoughts?
-
@Aaron: I was also very surprised by that early line, but I think you'll see it's already been reduced significantly. Is the game more winnable than the Wisconsin game? I wouldn't go that far, in large part because of my regard for J.T. Barrett. He obviously poses a much more significant threat than, say, Wisconsin's two ordinary quarterbacks. Along those lines, Ohio State is averaging 46.2 points per game, while Wisconsin is averaging only 24. The Buckeye offense is much more formidable.
-
Mr. S: Not to be a Pollyanna, but it hurts a lot less to discuss a close loss to a quality team, rather than a blowout. That said, while Northwestern showed you can go into the Horseshoe with a "lesser" team and play well, it's a fair assumption that NU will lose. Even so, at the start of the year, I think most fans would have settled for 7-2 after 9 games. Win out after OSU, and the B1G West championship is still a decent possibility.
-
@SteveUofN1964: @Steven M. Sipple: I think the chances of Nebraska finishing first in the Big Ten West will increase dramatically Saturday when Wisconsin loses at Northwestern and falls to 3-3 in the league. I saw signs Saturday of the Badgers wearing down. What's more, Clayton Thorson, the Northwestern quarterback, is playing exceptionally well right now. If the Wildcats win, they would stand a decent chance of finishing 7-2 or 6-3 in the league.
-
-
-
Sip. The last drive of regulation bothered me. NU has the ball at the 50 with 1 minute and 2 time outs left. Perfect time for a QB draw or run to outside. Would have caught them off guard a bit I e believe. And a bomb on 3rd down??? 15 yards and we are in field goal range. That to me was the poor play calling.
-
-
@Tone: The reason is Mick Stoltenberg, Kevin Maurice and Carlos Davis -- the top three tackles -- are playing at a pretty high level, especially Maurice. At the end position, I'm a little surprised we haven't seen more of A.J. Natter, a 6-foot-5, 260-pound junior. As for Alex Davis, a redshirt freshman, he has played organized football for only a few years and would be squaring off against battle-tested veterans in the Big Ten most of the time. We're talking about guys with families of their own in some cases. He also could stand to add size and strength. He obviously has the requisite quickness and athleticism.
-
-
@Wondermonds: Good question. I got the sense that Nebraska remains hungry and eager to prove themselves -- really not much different than its demeanor entering Camp Randall. This is a team with a great attitude and excellent unity/chemistry. The Huskers may be even hungrier this week, come to think of it.
-
Sat night stung. I'm one of those calling it a missed opportunity, and I'm struggling with those who call it growth. One local writer even compared it to the 94 Orange Bowl, good grief. Nebraska had 17 seniors on the 2 deep, Wisconsin had 7. I still think Riley is pretty discouraged with the O this year, especially considering the veteran talent on that side of the bowl. He fired Langsdorf once as play caller, would he do it again?
-
@JimNE: Jim, Nebraska is 7-1 (4-1 Big Ten). The Huskers have been sputtering on offense the last four games, but it's hardly a train wreck. They're 48th nationally in average yards per game (429.6) and 49th in points (32.0). With due respect, it seems a bit over-the-top to suggest firings.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I'll be cheering for NW this weekend as NU has the tie-breaker over them. With the CC most likely going to the playofss, if NU is the B1G runner-up, could end up in the Rose Bowl with a very good chance to win (assuming Wash. is also in the play-offs), nice consolation prize
-
-
With Maliek Collins starting at times for the Cowboys and Vincent Valentine for Belichick, do you think Mark Banker's dismissive comments about their commitment and focus when they were at NU was an attempt to deflect attention from their lack of dominance under the tutelage of Hank Hughes and Banker?
-
@NewportRed: That's a valid question. I never felt for a second that Collins lacked commitment and focus. Valentine was injured much of last season. I'm not ducking your question, but I think it would've been hard to get an accurate read on Valentine/Collins' relationship with the new staff without being around the team on a regular basis -- as in daily.
-
-
@Steve: Thank you for the kind words. It's all about context. In 1997, I never would've dreamed I'd be writing a column heaping praise on a Nebraska football coaching staff and team in general ... after a loss. But in the context of the past dozen years, which included so many embarrassments on big stages (dating to before the Pelini years, in fact), such a response to this particular loss seems to make sense.
-
To add to the o-line commentary: I believe Riley said something to the extent that we have the least amount of sacks in the league? With as porous as the O-line has been this year, that's a testament to Tommy's athleticism, his escapability, and the effectiveness of the YOLO Spin.